I should own up to not being certain. Unquestionably, numerous people accept, profoundly, in the truth of past, present and future marvels. They have in my perspective decent and faithful convictions. However, concerning my part, numerous conceivable contemplations exist which debilitate, in cases truly, the validity of wonders.
So I stay uncertain. Yet, what might be said about the inverse? How might I answer the contrary inquiry, for example did wonders not happen? Have there not been, are there not presently, and will there not be, marvels?
On that inquiry, I am solidly acim persuaded we can not preclude the chance of supernatural occurrences. In spite of the believable contemplations which cast uncertainty on supernatural occurrences, those contemplations don’t project adequate uncertainty. We should stay open to the conceivable presence of marvels.
Any why would that be? For various reasons, and they don’t be guaranteed to understand traditional reasoning.
Marvels don’t have to abuse the regular regulations
Marvels can be, and frequently are, characterized as events where a profound or supernatural power (essentially a God) overrides, suspends or disregards a characteristic regulation. That would address a typical portrayal, and one that mirrors a long and rich record of scriptural records, religious reflection and normal conviction.